On February 7, 2025, King Soopers initiated legal proceedings against United Food and Commercial Workers Local 7.
The grocery giant accuses the union of trying to apply undue pressure for multi-union negotiations that involve groups unrelated to UFCW Local 7.
Legal Allegations
In its lawsuit, King Soopers argues that the union’s actions breach the National Labor Relations Act.
They characterize UFCW Local 7’s tactics as threatening and coercive, asserting that these behaviors have impeded fair negotiations.
In response, UFCW Local 7 dismissed the lawsuit as baseless, claiming it merely distracts from the company’s attempts to silence worker voices amid ongoing contract talks.
Dispute Overview
At the heart of the dispute is an allegation that the union resorted to threats of striking to force King Soopers into discussions with other unions representing external workers.
With new contract negotiations set to begin in October and previous contracts having expired in January, King Soopers indicates that representatives from several other unions have joined the talks, pushing for a multi-union negotiation framework.
Responses to the Lawsuit
King Soopers insists it has consistently rebuffed these multi-union demands.
However, the grocery chain claims UFCW Local 7 has slowed down the negotiation process by introducing representatives from other unions.
The lawsuit seeks damages, citing that these actions have resulted in significant costs for the company.
In contrast, UFCW Local 7 firmly defends its stance, arguing that the allegations in the lawsuit are without merit.
The union emphasizes its unwavering commitment to championing workers’ rights and securing fair contracts.
They also deny any use of coercive methods during negotiations, highlighting their focus on advocating for employees’ interests throughout the bargaining journey.
Source: HRDive